To access or download, click the image or here
by Amr Hamzawy and Sarah Grebowski (April, 2010)
To access, please click the video box.
Recognition by Egypt’s leading Jihadists that violence has failed to achieve political change and in fact has been counterproductive has led them to a remarkable change of course. After years of violent confrontation with the Egyptian government and society, and defeat by the country’s security forces, al-Jama‘a al-Islamiya and, later, segments of al-Jihad have accepted their failure to radically change society and politics, and to recognize the harm that their violent activities—formerly justifi ed using religious concepts—have infl icted on Muslims and non-Muslims alike. These developments have given rise to a Jihadi revisionism that renounces violence and redefi nes attitudes toward the state, politics, and society. The same Islamic concepts that once were used to justify violence have been redefi ned to sanction and urge nonviolent social and political activism. Revisionist documents outline a careful cost-benefi t analysis that effectivelyrules out the use of violence to achieve the groups’ goals. A variety of factors prevent al-Jama‘a and al-Jihad from fully implementing these reformed views, such as the Egyptian regime’s refusal to allow members of either group to reintegrate into the country’s political and social fabric and al-Jihad’s specifi c challenge of disseminating revisionist ideas throughout its fragmented movement that still largely condones violence. However, Jihadi revisionism has led both groups to forego violence and has shifted Egypt’s Islamist spectrum toward moderation.